Ionel Van den Berg
๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ญ | ๐‡๐จ๐ฐ ๐ˆ ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐š๐ ๐ž ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ Every portfolio tells a story. Mine is built around one simple idea: Own businesses that benefit from long-term structural trends, and use market volatility to buy more when the thesis remains intact. This is how I invest my own money with a 5+ year horizon. ๐Ÿค– ๐€๐ˆ ๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ง'๐ญ ๐Ž๐ง๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐ง๐ฒ AI is a major exposure, but I see it as an ecosystem. AI needs chips. Chips need advanced manufacturing and memory. Data centers need networking, cooling and huge amounts of electricity. Businesses need software to make AI useful. Automation needs robotics. Future connectivity may rely on space. Rather than predicting one winner, I prefer to own multiple parts of the value chain. โš–๏ธ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐Œ๐จ๐๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐ž๐ ๐๐š๐ซ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ฅ The portfolio is built around three core pillars: โš“ ๐€๐ง๐œ๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ Market leaders with durable advantages, strong fundamentals and the potential to compound for many years. Their quality and resilience justify larger allocations. ๐Ÿš€ ๐Œ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ Higher-growth businesses with greater upside across AI, robotics, space, fintech, e-commerce and emerging markets. Movers are more established growth businesses; High Movers are smaller, higher-risk positions with asymmetric upside. Position sizes reflect that risk. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž Defense, critical infrastructure, energy, nuclear and short-term bonds. This pillar adds diversification, resilience and flexibility when markets become dislocated. Short-term bonds normally represent 15% of the portfolio, with flexibility toward 20%*. *Read my other pinned post! They aren't cash sitting permanently on the sidelines. They're dry powder, deployed using predefined market-risk signals during major dislocations and rebuilt as conditions normalize. ๐ŸŽฏ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐’๐ข๐ณ๐ข๐ง๐  Every position starts with a target weight. Depending on the position, my framework defines a comfort zone, review level, trim-to level and maximum weight. The comfort zone requires no action. Review and trim levels trigger reassessment or reduction when a position becomes too large. This keeps sizing systematic rather than emotional. More mature businesses can justify larger allocations; speculative companies remain smaller. I'd rather know 20โ€“25 companies exceptionally well than own 100 names I barely follow. ๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐‹๐ž๐ญ ๐–๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐‘๐ฎ๐ง If the thesis remains intact, I'm happy to let winners compound. I don't sell simply because a position has gone up. I reduce a position when: โ€ข The thesis changes. โ€ข The position becomes too large relative to its predefined limits. โ€ข I identify a clearly better use of the capital. Price alone isn't a reason to sell. ๐Ÿ”„ ๐‚๐š๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฌ ๐–๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  When I trim, the money gets a new purpose: โ€ข rebuilding the bond allocation; โ€ข adding to temporarily undervalued high-conviction holdings; โ€ข or funding a new high-conviction opportunity. If the thesis remains intact but the market temporarily undervalues a company, I'm willing to increase the position. ๐Ÿ“‰ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ก & ๐๐ฎ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ซ ๐…๐ซ๐š๐ฆ๐ž๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค I don't try to predict crashes. I prepare for them. When predefined market-risk conditions indicate a major dislocation, I can deploy the bond buffer into high-conviction positions while the thesis remains intact. As conditions normalize, the buffer is rebuilt according to predefined rules. The goal isn't to catch the bottom, but to have capital available when quality businesses become cheaper. ๐ŸŒ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‹๐จ๐ง๐  ๐†๐š๐ฆ๐ž I don't expect to outperform every month or quarter. There will be periods where this portfolio lags and periods where it moves much faster. That's the nature of concentrated growth. What matters is the result after an entire market cycle, not one headline or earnings season. My objective is long-term compounding with enough risk control to stay invested through major drawdowns. ๐Ÿ” ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ The portfolio isn't set and forgotten. I regularly reassess the thesis, fundamentals, valuation, competitive position, sector outlook and sizing. Predefined review levels trigger deeper reassessment, with a comprehensive review at least annually. The goal isn't to predict every move, but to keep the portfolio aligned with the investment framework. โœ… ๐ˆ๐ง ๐’๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ญ โœ… 5+ year horizon โœ… Long only โœ… No leverage โœ… No shorting โœ… No crypto โœ… Structural growth โœ… AI ecosystem exposure โœ… Emerging-market growth โœ… Three-pillar Modified Barbell โœ… Defined position sizing โœ… Predefined risk limits โœ… Let winners run โœ… Buy when conviction remains intact โœ… Tactical bond buffer โœ… Rules-based crash deployment โœ… Long-term compounding โœ… Disciplined capital allocation The goal isn't to predict the future. The goal is to own it. ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐. ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐. ๐‘๐ž๐ฉ๐ž๐š๐ญ. ๐Ÿš€ โ€” Ionel
Not investment advice. The author may have financial interests in the mentioned instruments.
2 replies
1 reply
1 reply
1 reply
null
.