Matej Kranjc
๐™ƒ๐™š๐™ก๐™ก๐™ค ๐™š๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™š, ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ฌ๐™š๐™ก๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ฌ ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง๐™จ. Thereโ€™s been a major shift in both economic news and political tensions. As a result, Iโ€™ve made substantial changes to the portfolio. ๐˜ฝ๐™„๐™‚ ๐™Ž๐™ƒ๐™„๐™๐™ ๐™„๐™‰ ๐™…๐™Š๐˜ฝ๐™Ž ๐˜ฟ๐˜ผ๐™๐˜ผ Fridayโ€™s payroll data not only fell short of expectations - coming in at 73,000 job gains for July vs. the expected 100,000 - but also revealed significant downward revisions for May and June, totaling 258,000 fewer jobs than previously reported. This effectively brings job growth to a standstill over the past three months. While this isnโ€™t necessarily a definitive sign of a recession, it clearly highlights underlying economic weaknesses. Still, this isnโ€™t the sole reason I made changes to the portfolio, as Iโ€™ll explain below. ๐™€๐™Ž๐˜พ๐˜ผ๐™‡๐˜ผ๐™๐™„๐™‰๐™‚ ๐™‹๐™Š๐™‡๐™„๐™๐™„๐˜พ๐˜ผ๐™‡ ๐™๐™€๐™‰๐™Ž๐™„๐™Š๐™‰๐™Ž ๐™€๐™ญ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ก: Just as it seemed tariffs might be cooling down amid ongoing negotiations, Trump once again escalated the trade war - this time targeting Brazil with a 51% tariff. In addition, tensions have been rising between former Russian president Medvedev and Trump, culminating in the deployment of two U.S. nuclear submarines to strategic positions closer to Russia. ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ก: Something felt off about Powellโ€™s last press conference. I doubt he would have spoken the way he did if he had known the jobs numbers beforehand - unless something else is going on behind the scenes. My guess? Major political games between Democrats and Republicans, with the Federal Reserve caught in the middle - being pressured either to "bend the knee" or fight to remain independent. Trump also fired the Labor Statistics Commissioner, allegedly for manipulating data to make him look bad, and will likely appoint someone more aligned with his views - regardless of accuracy. Since Trumpโ€™s election in 2016, political extremism has only increased on both the left and right, which is what originally led me to start investing a year or two later. The Fed may be trying to signal that it wonโ€™t be pushed around, or there could be multiple communication breakdowns caused by these political tensions. Meanwhile, tariff-induced inflation is creeping into the economy, potentially causing price spikes that companies might blame on tariffs - even if itโ€™s just an excuse for bigger profits. ๐™’๐™ƒ๐˜ผ๐™'๐™Ž ๐˜ผ๐™ƒ๐™€๐˜ผ๐˜ฟ Weโ€™re entering a critical period. If the Fed is as slow to act as it was in raising rates, we might not see cuts until December 2026. I doubt theyโ€™ll be that slow againโ€”but even a delay of 3โ€“4 months could cause serious problems. ๐˜พ๐™ƒ๐˜ผ๐™‰๐™‚๐™€๐™Ž ๐™๐™Š ๐™๐™ƒ๐™€ ๐™‹๐™Š๐™๐™๐™๐™Š๐™‡๐™„๐™Š I followed these principles when adjusting the portfolio: - Simplify the portfolio for clarity and agility - Reduce short-term risk - Balance gains and losses for tax purposes - Keep leading data/AI companies ๐™’๐™ƒ๐™” ๐™Ž๐™„๐™ˆ๐™‹๐™‡๐™„๐™๐™”? In a time of massive daily disruptions, a simplified portfolio allows for: - Faster decision-making - Easier analysis of how macroeconomic changes affect holdings - Better clarity in evaluating risk ๐™’๐™ƒ๐™” ๐™๐™€๐˜ฟ๐™๐˜พ๐™€ ๐™๐™„๐™Ž๐™†? In my view, thereโ€™s a 30โ€“70% chance of a recession, depending on: - How the Fed reacts going forward - How many more disruptions the President causes Another weak report combined with inaction from the Fed - or persistent inflation despite labor market weakness - could tip the scales. ๐™†๐™€๐™€๐™‹ ๐˜ผ๐™„/๐˜ฝ๐™„๐™‚ ๐˜ฟ๐˜ผ๐™๐˜ผ ๐˜พ๐™Š๐™ˆ๐™‹๐˜ผ๐™‰๐™„๐™€๐™Ž Unfortunately, the world appears to be moving toward a future eerily similar to many dystopian sci-fi films - where the wealth gap grows, policing intensifies, riots become more common, and monopolies thrive. AI could be a major driver of this shift. Itโ€™s possible weโ€™re heading for a world divided between the ultra-wealthy and the rest - if we manage to avoid nuclear conflict. ๐™๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐™‡๐™‡๐™” ๐™๐™ƒ๐™€ ๐˜พ๐™ƒ๐˜ผ๐™‰๐™‚๐™€๐™Ž ๐™„ ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™˜๐™ก๐™ค๐™จ๐™š๐™™ the following positions: - WBA roughly 75% loss (possibly not agile enough for the future that's comming and to balance other gains) - CRSR roughly 70% loss (don't see much future for fun and games in current world) - NEE with a 1%, 8% and 20% ๐™œ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ and SEDG with 87%, 88% and 90% ๐™ก๐™ค๐™จ๐™จ (Sadly, I believe renewable energy companies will struggle in the coming years, as the global focus shifts from protecting the future to simply surviving the present.) - MU with a 27% and 55.75% gain (Samsung just started a price war with MU making the risk too high specially for current situation in the world) ๐™„ ๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™–๐™ก๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™˜๐™ก๐™ค๐™จ๐™š๐™™: PLTR with a 565.5% and 593.9% gain Palantir has reached extreme valuation levels. While it may keep rising, recent trends show that even strong earnings haven't prevented selloffs. Given current market sentiment, I believe it would take a blowout report to justify the current price. A miss - or even just meeting expectations - could trigger a 20%+ drop.
null
.