CrisMax78
Risk Score and Misleading Interpretation When I first ventured into trading, the term 'low risk' often confused me. It seemed to imply that low risk is synonymous with slow but steady growth. However, I've come to realize that 'low risk' might be a bit misleading. It's not about guaranteed growth, but more about the potential for smaller losses or gains. The risk of loss is always present, regardless of whether it's labeled as 'low' or 'high'. This brings me to wonder, how many of you have also misconstrued 'low risk' as a path to certain gains, rather than understanding it as a reference to the magnitude of potential loss or gain? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments! $GM (General Motors Co) $IRBT (iRobot Corp.) $AMRC (Ameresco Inc) $BYON (Beyond Inc) $HTZ (Hertz Global Holdings Inc) $ENPH (Enphase Energy Inc.) $LTHM $SEDG (SolarEdge Technologies) $CHWY (Chewy) $VAC (Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corp) $AMN (AMN Healthcare Services Inc.) $DISH $FMC (FMC Corp) $PCRX (Pacira BioSciences Inc.) $AAP (Advance Auto Parts Inc) $ADNT (Adient plc) $ABT (Abbott Laboratories) $NTCT (NetScout Systems Inc.) $NIO (Nio Inc.-ADR) $NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) $PFE (Pfizer) $BABA (Alibaba-ADR) $CHWY
Yes, Misunderstood initially
100.00%
No, Always understood it
100.00%
Like CommentShare
null
.