Giorgio Reveco Barraza
📘 How I keep my analysis safe from the narrative that tries to mislead me One of the most subtle traps in investing, and one I constantly watch in my own process, is narrative coherence. It is that moment when the story I tell myself about a stock becomes so convincing that it starts to replace the data. I remind myself often: the narrative must appear after the analysis, never before. When I notice the story trying to take the lead, I activate several filters to recover objectivity. 1) Data first, story second If a thesis begins with something like “this company is incredible” instead of starting with revenue growth, margins, competitive position or valuation, I know the story is trying to steer the decision. The narrative can only be a consequence, never the engine. 2) Write the counter thesis I force myself to answer this with complete honesty: “what would need to happen for this trade to be a mistake”. If I cannot list three clear risks, it means I am defending a story instead of evaluating an asset. 3) Separate conviction from evidence Conviction comes from experience and intuition, but evidence is something else. Sometimes I reread my own arguments as if they were written by someone else. If they cannot survive a cold review, I adjust the thesis immediately. 4) Ask: “would I accept this thesis if it came from someone I do not know” This filter destroys any narrative that feels too comfortable. If I would not accept the argument from a stranger, then I should not accept it from myself without further scrutiny. 5) Detect confirmation bias when it blends with narrative This usually shows up with very popular companies like $NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) or $TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd - ADR) , It is easy to say “the price dropped, this is an opportunity” without asking whether the drop reflects something more structural. If I start searching only for data that confirms the buy and dismiss everything negative as noise, I know instantly what is happening: the narrative is taking control. 6) Review the thesis in a calm state Emotional distance removes distortions. If I read the thesis again several days later and it feels weaker, it means the narrative was doing its work quietly. In summary, the goal is not to eliminate the narrative. It will always be present. The goal is to stress test it and demand that it proves it is truly supported by data. This type of discipline not only improves my decisions, it also protects those who rely on my management. If you find this helpful, I will be glad to continue deepening the topic.
null
.