Veronika Tykhonova
Veronika Tykhonova
United Arab Emirates
๐™…๐™ช๐™ก๐™ฎ: ๐™’๐™ž๐™ก๐™™ ๐™๐™ž๐™™๐™š, ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ข๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ July was the month the AI trade finally showed its volatility. Sharp semiconductor corrections early, massive single-day rebounds on Microsoft earnings, 30-year Treasury yields touching levels not seen since 2007. The S&P closed up just 0.44%. The headline number hides how uncomfortable the ride was. What made it interesting wasn't the moves themselves. It was who said what. Goldman Sachs' head of asset allocation research published a piece this month arguing that most investor portfolios have quietly drifted too far into tech and innovation stocks and aren't protected enough against inflation. Think of it this way: the more your portfolio looks like the S&P 500, the more concentrated it is in a handful of AI names. When those names correct, everything corrects together. His prescription: short-duration bonds, real assets, regional diversification. Assets that don't move in lockstep with tech. That's exactly what this portfolio is built around. Not a prediction, just a risk management choice that's becoming more relevant by the month. In July I trimmed positions that stopped earning their place, cut the inverse Nasdaq hedge held since April, reduced some losing names. The portfolio is cleaner and more focused now. Closed the month up 1%. September Fed meeting is the next real test. ๐˜•๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฆ. ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜บ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด.
Not investment advice. The author may have financial interests in the mentioned instruments.
2 replies
null
.