Bernardus Smith
$SPX500 / $SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) ๐…๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ค ๐ข๐ง ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐›๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ Over long periods, the S&P 500 has been remarkably consistent. Since 1928, total returns look roughly like this: - 9.9% nominal annualised - 6.7% after inflation - 73% of calendar years finish positive Thatโ€™s the headline most people stop at. However - let's look at the distribution. The best year on record was 1954 (+52.6%). The worst was 1931 (โˆ’43.8%). Those are outliers - but they influence expectations far more than they should. ๐‘๐ž๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฉ - 2022: โˆ’18.1% - 2023: +26.3% - 2024: +25.0% - 2025: +17.7% A sharp drawdown, followed by three strong years. Historically, this pattern hasnโ€™t been especially good at predicting what comes next directionally. Markets rarely move that cleanly. If you step back and look at base rates instead of narratives, though, the picture is fairly straightforward. ๐‹๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐ก๐ž๐š๐ This isnโ€™t a forecast or a position. Historically, about 3 out of 4 years are positive - and roughly 1 out of 4 are not. That makes a negative year a normal outcome, not a surprise. From here, the odds donโ€™t look unusual - just less forgiving than theyโ€™ve been. If you had to pick a base case, what happens to the $SPX500 / $SPY in 2026?
Not investment advice. The author may have financial interests in the mentioned instruments.
Strong +20% or more
100.00%
Moderate +5% to +20%
100.00%
Flat -5% to +5%
100.00%
Negative โˆ’10% or worse
100.00%
null
.