Stelian Mitu
๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ'๐˜€ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ: ๐—›๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐——๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ป'๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜, ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—œ๐˜ ๐—ข๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฅ๐—ต๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐ŸŽต Took 25 years for $CSCO (Cisco Systems Inc) to close above its 2000 dot-com peak, the year it briefly became the world's most valuable company at ~$570B .Anyone who bought at the top only just broke even recently. Sound familiar? $NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is today's Dฬตoฬตtฬตcฬตoฬตmฬต ๐€๐ˆ picks-and-shovels giant, just as $CSCO was for the internet. But great company does not equal great investment at any price. The AI cycle is real. The Dotcom cycle was real too. $NVDA's dominance is real - and so was $CSCO's. Yet it still took 25 years. How much is already in the price? That's always the question. ๐Ÿค” History may not repeat. But it rhymes. Take care out there. ๐Ÿ™ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ธ | ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜† ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ | ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐˜€
Not investment advice. The author may have financial interests in the mentioned instruments.
null
.