Bernardus Smith
๐—œ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น? Iโ€™m genuinely curious how people think about this. My answer is no and here's why: In 2023, some of the best resourced funds in the world were short $NVDA. They had the models, the analysts, the conviction. The valuation looked stretched. The thesis made sense. The stock tripled anyway. They lost over $30 billion. Not because they were wrong about the valuation. But because the market didn't care about their timeline - margin did. When a stock moves hard against you, most people can't hold. Psychologically or financially. And if you're using leverage, the broker decides when you're out - not you. On the long side, being early just means waiting. On the short side, being early means losing money while you wait. There's also a ceiling on what you can make. A stock can't go below zero. So 100% is your best day ever. On the long side there's no ceiling - some companies go up 1000%+ over years. I'd rather be on the right side of that equation. If I'm worried about markets, I reduce exposure. I hold cash. That's enough. ๐——๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น?
Not investment advice. The author may have financial interests in the mentioned instruments.
Yes, regularly
100.00%
Only high conviction
100.00%
No, not worth it
100.00%
null
.