Sergiu Andrei Niga
Passive Vs Active investment Why there isn’t the universal solution for all of us. I’d like to bring a very basic yet fundamental topic, as I believe that from time to time we should refresh our memory. Passive investing aims to replicate the performance of a specific market index, such as the $SPX500 or $NSDQ100 rather than trying to outperform it. This type of investment is based on the belief that it is difficult, if not impossible, to consistently beat the market in the long run (20 years or more). The main advantage of passive investment lays into the costs, which are generally much lower, as they require less research and active management. On the other hand we have Active investing, which seeks to outperform market returns through strategic stock selection, in-depth analysis, and market timing. The decisions of buying or selling are based on their research and economic forecasts. This approach requires constant analysis and intensive market monitoring and for this reason tend to have higher management fees. The main advantage of active investment lays in above average returns, even if there is no guarantee of success. I do not believe that one is better than the other, the choice depends on the investor’s individual goals, risk tolerance, and how much time one can dedicate to investing.
null
.